|

Other Views
U.S. must welcome immigrants with special skills
May 14, 2006
BY MARTIN H. SINGER
My father used to tell me a story about a man looking for his keys under the
light of a lamppost. Another man walks by and offers to help him and asks where
he thought that he had dropped the keys. The first man replies that he thought
that he dropped them somewhere down the street. When the good samaritan asks why
the man is looking in this area, the man responds, "because the light is better
over here."
The country is talking about immigration these days. The light's pretty good.
We can see technologists from India and China and Eastern Europe filling jobs at
high- growth companies. We can see other foreign-born workers working in
restaurants, on construction projects, in salons and in our friends' homes. And,
of course, we are all talking about solutions.
Scientists a 'no-cost import'
But solutions to what problem? Most pundits and
media-seeking politicians stand under the wrong lamppost. They talk about lost
jobs, the social burden of immigrant workers, the downward pressure on low-end
wages and anything that will keep us all from shining a flashlight on the very
real crisis confronting America: U.S. competitiveness.
That's right. Today, many claim that we should
restrict the number of visas that enable highly trained but foreign-born and
-educated workers to take jobs in this country. They ignore that the United
States has slipped to sixth internationally in the number of engineering degrees
awarded annually. China graduates four times as many engineers; Japan graduates
twice as many. Half of all U.S. graduate degrees in engineering go to foreign
nationals.
The United States used to welcome workers with
special skills. We issued H1-B visas that permitted highly trained foreign
workers to fill engineering and computer science positions. J-1 visas allowed
architectural and other firms to bring over interns on exchange programs. It was
a no-cost import. It was as if other countries were willingly filling up our
strategic oil reserves. Scientists, who someone else paid to educate and train,
were clamoring to work and settle in our country and help our companies compete
in a global marketplace.
Should we have barred Einstein?
Today, the xenophobes and the protectionists have
taken over. In the aftermath of 9/11, with the same analytic sophistication that
identified WMDs as a great threat, Congress slashed the number of H1-B visas
from more than 200,000 a year to 65,000. American businesses consumed all of the
available visas two months before the beginning of this fiscal year.
On one side of the congressional aisle, we hear
that Americans must know the whereabouts of all foreigners. These congressional
leaders ignore the requirement of H1-B visa holders to work for a sponsoring
firm -- that has an address.
On the other side of the aisle, we have the
Pavlovian response that immigrants take "American" jobs. No one has ever offered
one iota of credible evidence that U.S. graduates with engineering, software or
other degrees have lost jobs to H1-B visa holders, but that doesn't stop the
protectionist drool.
There is evidence today that the xenophobic
climate in the United States, coupled with improved opportunity in their county
of origin, have motivated some technologists to leave the United States and go
home. Other English-speaking countries, such as Australia and South Africa, have
established stronger engineering programs at their universities so that they can
train and keep the students that we used to welcome.
As our government increases its hostility to
foreigners and denies U.S. businesses access to necessary resources, technology
companies exercise the other option before them: they outsource. The politicians
who puff up their chests and represent themselves as protectors of the American
worker are doing nothing more than accelerating the tsunami of jobs going
overseas.
The panderers, who would use 9/11 to advance an
anti-foreigner agenda in the name of national security, make us less secure by
stripping the United States of valuable human resources. Have they forgotten the
role of foreign-born scientists in our development of defense technologies?
Would they have sent Albert Einstein back home? Not allowed Andy Grove to stay
and build Intel?
We should be talking about solutions. We should
address the crisis of U.S. competitiveness at home and abroad.
We should staple a green card to every
foreign-born student who completes a college-level program in engineering. We
want those human resources to stay in this country, help us build and support
our businesses and raise families.
We should immediately expand the number of H1-B
visas to 500,000 and at the same time improve our own funding of technology
education.
If we don't take action, we won't be talking
about immigration. The topic will be emigration as our children take advantage
of opportunities in other countries. I hope that they can get a visa.
Marty Singer is chairman and CEO of PCTEL and chairman of the American
Electronics Association's Midwest Council.
The Chicago
Sun-Times |