Five Common Myths
About Stock Options Corey Rosen,
National Center for Employee Ownership
During the 1990s, according to the National Center for Employee
Ownership, the number of employees getting stock options ballooned from less than
one million at the start of the decade to about 10 million by the end. Stock options
provide employees the right to buy shares of company stock at a price fixed today (usually
the market price) for a number of years (usually ten) into the future. So if the stock
price goes up, you can buy shares at a very cheap price. The press was full of reports of
"optionnaires," employees who struck it rich when their companys stock
skyrocketed. Then the market collapsed, and instead stories were being written about
option tax disasters, precipitous declines in morale of option-ladened employees, and a
rapid move away from compensating employees with equity. While much of the reporting on
stock options was accurate and insightful, much of it subscribed to common myths that
distorted what was happening, both during the markets rise and after its fall. For a
variety of reasons, options granted to most or all employees have become an
institutionalized part of compensation at many companies. It is important, then, to
separate the myth from the reality about how these plans work.
Myth #1: Most People Getting Options Worked for Dot-Coms
One of the most prevalent and misleading misperceptions was (and still is)
that most employees getting options work (or now worked) for dot-com companies, most of
whom were small, pre-IPO ventures. This was never even close to true. There were a lot of
dot-coms, to be sure, and most of them did give most or all their employees options, but
most also employed well under 100 people. The total employment at all the pre-IPO dot-com
companies never amounted to more than a few percent of the 10 million people getting
options. In fact, almost all the employees getting options work (and worked) for publicly
traded companies, and most of these work for large employers. Verizon, for instance, makes
most of its over 200,000 employees eligible for options. It would take 5,000 dot-coms with
40 employees each to have that many employees.
Myth 2: OK, Well at Least They Worked for High-Technology Companies
The large majority of high-technology companies do make most of their
employees eligible for stock options, but even the highest estimates for the technology
sector place employment at about five million. If 60% of these get options (a reasonable
guess), then only three million employees getting options are technology workers. In fact,
about 15% to 20% of all public companies give employees options, and many of these are
outside the technology sector. Many large banks provide broad options, for instance, as do
a number of large pharmaceutical companies. Retailers like Whole Foods, Walgreens, and
Starbucks give out broad options. So do PepsiCo and Procter & Gamble.
Myth #3: Most People Give Up Pay to Get Options
Economists tell us there is no free lunch, so if someone gets options they
must be giving up pay or benefits. To be sure, some employees have done just that. There
are lots of people who were lured to start-up companies at lower salaries in return for
substantial option packages. But these people are the exceptions. For the most part, they
are at the managerial level or higher, or people with special skills, such as programmers.
Altogether, they comprise only a tiny portion of all the employees getting options. Data
from Professors Joseph Blasi and Douglas Kruse at Rutgers University indicate that,
overall, employees getting options are paid about seven percent more in wages than
comparable employees in comparable companies that do not give out options. The fact is
that with a tight labor market and we still have a labor market that is tighter
than historical standards it is very difficult to lure all but a handful of
risk-takers to jobs whose base pay and benefits are not comparable to what could be earned
elsewhere. Options are gravy to help companies distinguish themselves. In the tech sector,
they are not even that everyone gives out options widely, so they are just part of
the ante to the game.
Myth #4: Options Are Only Worthwhile if Your Company is Publicly Traded
Many stories advised employees that if their company was not on a public
stock market, their options were worthless and would be until the company did an IPO
which very few ever would do. In fact, most closely held companies giving out
options are sold (assuming they dont close first), at which time the options are
usually exchanged for cash or for stock in the acquiring company at the sale price.
Myth #5: Options Are the Last Decades Compensation
Surely, this myth goes, no one wants options any more. Lots of employees
have lots of options deeply "underwater," meaning the price at which the
employee can buy shares is way above the current price, making the option probably
worthless. So who wants more? Employees do, and employers want them to have them. Data
from the National Center for Employee Ownership show that most companies with broad-based
stock options plans have no plans to change, much less eliminate them. Most of these
companies now dole out the options over a period of years, rather than all at once. So
employees got some options at a very high price, but will get some more at what seems like
a very low one. These new options could be worth a lot one day. Moreover, many employees
have options in companies that have been more stable, and their options either are still
worth something, or are close to that point.
To be sure, people and companies are now more realistic about what options
can mean. They are probably not going to make more than a handful of people rich, but, for
most option holders, they provide a worthwhile additional benefit. And for most option
granting companies, they provide a way to link employee and corporate fortunes for the
long term. Options are not the ready path to riches they may have seemed to some, nor the
magic elixir for corporate recruitment, retention and motivation problems they seemed to
others, but they have too many advantages to both sides to go the way of hula hoops and
pet rocks.
This article is available fore reprinting, with approved attribution.
An electronic Word version can be sent on request.