|
Spyware:
Spyware is a catch-all term for computer programs
that can track computer users' movements online. Spyware is a serious
problem that can create substantial privacy risks, increase the risk of
identity theft, and cause serious degradation to personal and business
computers that can cost millions of dollars in lost productivity. AeA
has created a checklist that legislators can follow to create good
Spyware legislation; specifically it should contain:
- State Attorney Generals should have the sole
enforcement ability. No private rights of action
- Intentionally deceptive standard
- Regulate bad actors and practices while not
impeding e-commerce and technology
- Caps on damages
- Define Personally Identifiable
Information as a
combination of:
a.
The first name or first initial in combination with the last name
b.
A home or other physical address including street name,
c.
Personal identification code in conjunction with a password
required to access an identified account,
d.
Social security number, tax identification number, driver's
license number, passport number, or any other government-issued
identification number, or
e.
Account balance, overdraft history, or payment history that
personally identifies an owner or operator of a computer.
Spam
We believe that both states and the federal
government can work to protect consumers, and make the Internet a safe
place to work and play. Further, legislation should contemplate online
service providers, whose email servers are constantly bombarded with
Spam, to the detriment of its customers. AeA has created a checklist
that legislators can follow to create good Spam legislation;
specifically, it should:
- Ban false or misleading headers;
- Identify the email message as an advertisement
in the subject line;
- Allow consumers to opt-out of receiving
subsequent commercial email;
- Protect pre-existing business relationships;
- Prevent the harvesting of consumer email
addresses;
Online Privacy
AeA believes that in order to promote consumer confidence – and
thus encourage e-commerce – a three-pronged plan needs to be put into
action.
- Strong non-discriminatory, federal preemption
legislation needs to be adopted, so as to set a uniform national
standard to ensure consumer privacy;
- States should be discouraged from passing laws
or regulations that unnecessarily obstructs interstate commerce; and
- Online businesses, vendors, and government alike
all need to respect individuals' privacy.
Age Verification
We believe that there is no single solution for
best protecting children online. Rather online safety requires a
multi-faceted approach involving ever evolving technology, public
education and partnerships with law enforcement and other groups to keep
the Internet safe for children. As a result, AeA opposes age
verification for the following reasons:
- To date there is no proven mechanism for age
verification for users under the age of 18.
- Providing credit card, social security, or
driver licenses information raises significant privacy and security
issues, including legal issues that have not yet been addressed.
- State Age Verification Laws create potential
constitutional Supremacy and Commerce Clause conflicts with the
establishment of Communication Decency Act of 1996.
- There are already technical solutions in place
that help parents and children make sure their experiences on the
Internet are fun and safe (parental controls)
- AeA supports providing new and more effective
tools for law enforcement
- AeA supports increasing penalties for child
predators
- AeA supports creating new innovative ways to
increase the awareness of parents and children to the dangers that
currently exist online.
Data Security/ ID
Theft (Security Breach):
Protecting consumers against identity theft
is a top priority on a number of legislative agendas, especially that of
the high-tech industry. Doing it correctly means instilling confidence
in E-commerce, thus helping our national economy. AeA has created a
checklist to help guide policy-makers when crafting legislation that
requires notifying consumers of a security breach that could lead to a
significant risk of identity theft or harm to a consumer.
- Notification should
occur when there is a significant risk of identity theft or harm
- Businesses should
send notice within the ordinary course of business
- Disclosure should be
made in the most expedient time possible allowing for measures
necessary to determine the scope of the breach, to restore the
integrity of the system, and is consistent with the legitimate needs
of law enforcement
- Personal Information
should be defined similarly to the Spyware definition
- State’s Attorneys
General should have the sole enforcement ability. No private rights of
action.
- Safe Harbor
Exceptions
Phishing
Phishing is an act or
acts that defraud someone by using a false web site or pretending to be
a legitimate business on the Web and fraudulently obtaining identifying
information. AeA has created a checklist that legislators can
follow to create good Phishing legislation; specifically, it should:
·
The Definition of Personally Identifiable Information
should comport with the definition in the spyware section
·
The individuals who must provide notice under the bill
should be limited to entities that “Own or License” the personal
information
·
The bill should permit entities to notify consumers of
security breaches through E-Mail
·
The bill should provide flexibility to entities in the
methodologies employed to protect personal information
·
There must be a focus on criminal intent within this
legislation
·
Legislation must assert that the State Attorney General
has sole enforcement authority
|